[Non-member submission]
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Who is? In what case?
>
> Oh, and I almost forgot about the Kerberos case ...
>
> As you surely know, Microsoft copied Kerberos into W2K
> and extended it a little bit.
>
> Then it published documents about their extension, with
> a click-through license that you have to promise to not
> try to implement their extension in order to be able to
> read their document...
>
> The case was documented on sites like Slashdot (which is
> down at the moment ... I'll provide the exact URL later).
OK, some URLs of /. stories on the subject. These stories
in turn link to quite a bit of coverage in other news
sources:
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/03/02/0958226.shtml
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/05/02/158204.shtml
And a few "meta" articles on how Microsoft tried to
censor the situation:
http://slashdot.org/features/00/05/11/0153247.shtml
http://slashdot.org/features/00/05/11/0153247.shtml
http://slashdot.org/features/00/05/13/2038233.shtml
http://slashdot.org/features/00/05/16/1321225.shtml
http://slashdot.org/features/00/05/18/2015251.shtml
And the conclusion (which took far too much trouble,
IMHO):
http://slashdot.org/articles/00/06/28/0042228.shtml
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:55 MDT