> The reason I question his inclusion was because I doubt he is a "total man"
> and I also question whether he is an "enlightened master." What, in
> particular, makes you think he is?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Daniel Ust
Well, he's dead now. So he isn't enlightened anymore. I equate the term "total
man" with "enlightened master" because the two terms seem to me to describe
identical beings. I put Mohammed in the same category with Buddha, Moses, Lao
Tzu, Christ, Krishna, Socrates, and Kabir because all these were fully awakened
beyond words. So, why did you single out Mohammed from the others?
--J. R.
"Something beckons within the reach of each of us
to save heroic genius. Find it, and do it.
For as goes heroic genius, so goes humankind."
--Alligator Grundy, _Analects of Atman_
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:47 MDT