I agree.
From: <hibbert@netcom.com>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Limits of tolerance
>
> Unfortunately, these kinds of protestations and testimonials are not a
> useful response. People who are found guilty in court, even those who are
> caught in the act often have quite a few people vouching for them. It's
> not the kind of thing that acquaintainces would be able to detect. The
> only thing this kind of response does is lend weight to the accusation by
> making it appear that a defense is worthwhile.
>
> I'm as shocked as anyone, and as disbelieving as any. (I know Keith
> somewhat better than I do Max.) If there were anything to these
> accusations, they would be brought up in court. In the absence of that,
> the best reaction to the accusation is silence. Treat it as if a child
> farted in a nice restaurant. Ignore it, or the child will do it again for
> the attention.
>
>
> Chris
> ---
> Chris Hibbert protecting privacy in the computer age is
> hibbert@netcom.com like trying to change a tire on a moving
car.
> http://discuss.foresight.org/~hibbert/home.html --Colin
> Bennett
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:23 MDT