Re: author identifiability

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Sun Aug 20 2000 - 13:39:03 MDT


At 01:52 PM 08/20/2000 -0500, you wrote:

>>From: Ian Goddard <igoddard@erols.com>
>
>>I did a deja.com search for the senders address
>>(jamiro2002@my-deja.com) and found these posts:
>>
>>http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=657317656&fmt=text
>>http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=658291615&fmt=text
>>http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=658293571&fmt=text
>>http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=659502817&fmt=text
>>
>>This bit from on of the headers:
>>
>>" X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x69.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 199.108.50.36 "
>>
>>suggests the IP address "199.108.50.36" is the sender's server.
>>
>>This page http://www.osilab.ch/dns_e.htm shows that server to be
>>"los-feliz.lapl.org" which is a Los Angeles Public Library server.
>>I'd contact the LAPL and find out what it takes to get an account
>>with them and what it takes for someone using their server to get
>>a my-deja.com address via an account with the LA library.
>
>If it is like the Houston Public library, you can just walk up and get on
>the Internet. No ID required.
>I myself have posted in just such a manner. It is *truly* anonymous
>posting, save for possible security cameras.
>
>Given that the poster went to such measures (he appeared to be literate
>enough to afford a computer), we might reasonably guess that he knows Max
>More, and vice versa. Perhaps he is a well-known enemy.

IAN: The person seems to be newly acquainted with and examining
the meme theory. I believe that to get the my-deja.com address
the person used, they have to have a fixed email address to
which a confirmation is sent like is the case for subscribing
to this list. If so, I'd assume they'd have to have an email
account with the library, which means they might be known. ??

------------------------------------------------------------
GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm
____________________________________________________________
Asking the "wrong questions," challenging the Official Story

   



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:20 MDT