Please. Not from 1947. If the japanese had that kind of technology in 1947 we
either wouldhave known about it at that point, or would have lost the war to
them. Alien encounters, so far as we can currently tell, are merely the product
of hypnogogic trances induced by chemical or electrical imbalances, as
Persinger's research with electric fields shows. If the level of alien
abductions are as high as proponents claim, there would be a fleet of at least
1000 such ufo's at a base on earth over the last 40 years, and at least one
crash every year. Such a fleet would require a resident population of a minimum
of 100,000 aliens to support with C3I, maintenance, and logistics support, and
this is also assuming that they don't have the same need for resources that we
do, that they do, in fact, have some sort of nanosanta technology. If they don't
have this then their logistical problems on increase from there.
Most of the alien BS you see is merely disinformation to cover for military R&D,
while some 'abduction' phenomena with material evidence may be evidence of
either government or corporate illegal experimentation on humans (since we know
the Energy Department has admitted to conducting such research for many years,
this is not out of the bounds of possiblity, not nearly as far as alien
abduction).
Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Max More wrote:
>
> > Not great, but an interesting look at the thinking of several people. It
> > gets more interesting in the second half. ExI Advisor Marvin Minsky is
> > quoted on parallel evolution of intelligence:
> >
> > http://www.msnbc.com/news/446603.asp?0nm=T15N
> >
> > Max
>
> The Controversial Colonel Corso in his book, "The Day After Roswell" has
> one complete chapter on the prospect that the allegedly captured aliens
> from Roswell were robots of a sort. I have to see that as something worth
> considering but with a different spin. If the "products of measured
> intelligence" can all be matched or exceeded by robots today using the
> state-of-the-art technology (as I conclude in the Epilogue of "Machine
> Psychology") then military intelligence cannot afford to ignore
> this. Black Projects must be dealing with this in some way right now
> because the prospect then exists of a robotic military intelligence centre
> having robots working tirelessly 24 hours a day on advancing military
> science and those robots are more intelligent than competing human
> military scientists, as defined above. No military worth its salt can
> afford to ignore the possibility of an enemy having such an installation.
> Theoretically, Japan for example could race centuries past the US with a
> hidden installation no bigger than a box car. And those "aliens" could
> then be advanced robots from centres such as this.
> FWP
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Machine Psychology: http://www.atoma.f2s.com/atomareport.html (file #10)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:08 MDT