----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <retroman@turbont.net>
>
> Its pretty well standard, perhaps some of the lawyers like Greg can
> contribute.
Maybe, but this is a very minor side issue... I wouldn't expect much.
> I know of a case,
Michael! First a hypothetical situation with a flawed conclusion, then a
sweeping generalized argument from authority and now anecdotal evidence?
I could play battling anecdotes with you, but it wouldn't prove anything.
You still haven't actually answered my first two objections.
A) You are responsible for your own actions.
B) Do the research if you are going to make an "argument from authority".
It's a weak argument in any case... but you don't get to make stuff up.
That isn't how reasoned discourse works.
Loree
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:35:48 MDT