> > I think some serious thought ought to be given to the honor system /
> > shareware paradigm by artists in general, and musicians in particular.
> > for instance, I recently Napstered Macy Gray’s excellent album, and am
> > enjoying it so much that I’d be *happy* to pay for the album (albeit at
> > steep discount, since I neither have nor want the CD medium or the fancy
> > packaging).
>You'd only get a "steep discount" if a substantial part of the costs are
>due to the CD medium and the packaging. What evidence is there that this
>is true? Isn't it well known that CD manufacturing costs are far lower
>the price of the CDs? The plastic packaging can't cost that much, either.
>I don't see why you'd expect a substantial discount purely due to this
>difference in distribution.
Its no secret in the music industry that over 75% of the cost of a CD goes
into manufacturing, packaging, distribution and record company profit. Only
about 1/5 of the price pays for actual production of the recording and
payment to the artist. It is *only* that 1/5 that I have any desire to pay.
Learn how your computer can earn you money while you sleep!
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:35:28 MDT