>From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <email@example.com>
>Napster is not in violation of copyright law because it does not itself
>in the distribution of MP3 tracks for profit, it produces software that
>people to trade MP3 tracks, with NO method of exchanging any payment for
>trade of MP3 files. Napster software users MIGHT be in violation of
>they are charging a fee for the distribution of MP3 files via the Napster
>software, which Metallica and the rest of the recording industry has not
>able to prove.
Profit is not the determining factor anymore. That used to be the case, but
the RIAA had that "profit" loop-hole closed with the enactment of the NET
Act. Now, regardless of whether you are doing it for profit, if you copy a
copyrighted work without permission from the copyright holder, you are a
Learn how your computer can earn you money while you sleep!
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:34:35 MDT