From: Spike Jones <email@example.com>
>Michael S. Lorrey wrote:
>>It just seems stupid to me for engineers to be taking what seems
>>to be a rifle approach when what they need is a shotgun...
>Mike there is a school of thought that holds this view. Right
>now the other is in fashion, but consider this: every weapon
>system must evolve and develop over time, otherwise it
>can be defeated, like the Maginot Line and the Great Wall.
>Missile defense is only 30 some years old. You can be sure
>that some time in the next 30 to 50, a team will develop a
>kill vehicle that carries something analogous to a number of
>shotgun shells. Look up ERINT on the web, see how much
>of that material is declassified (I dont know myself).
If memory serves this was once proposed by Arthur C Clarke.
Crude memory paraphrase:
"Imagine a ballistic missle in it's trajectory, now imagine another
missle in an opposite trajectory, it's warhead a large bucket of
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Mars Society, www.marssociety.org
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:34:33 MDT