On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:22:03 -0700, Max More <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Since Greg is more actively involved with the list than am I at this time,
> he will announce our ruling to curb this problem. I stand behind his
> statements and his judgement completely. Greg has the power to suspend
> the list those who ignore his ruling.
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:57:23 EDT, Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com> wrote:
> As a temporary measure in response to the extreme number of postings
> that have been generated by a small number of posters on a single topic,
> the subject of "guns" will be considered off-topic for the list for a
> of two weeks beginning on Saturday, June 12, 1999 at 12:01 am PST.
> Again as a temporary measure, any posters continuing existing "gun"
> threads, starting new ones or raising the subject of "guns" in existing
> threads during this two-week period will be unsubscribed from the list
> for a period of three months.
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:53:29 CDT, Mark Phillips (email@example.com)
>criminals convicted of violent crimes may be legitimately denied access to
>(1)Arguably, from a META-constitutional perspective, [....]
>(2)How do you determine whether a person is ("sufficiently")[....]
>(3)With *Nth-time* offenders, however, I have much less of a problem[....]
>Would WELCOME Joe's, Mike's, *et al* feedback here!
>[....]always look forward to your postings [....] on the "gun stuff."
Sorry to see you violate the gun ban. I will certainly miss your interesting posts for the next three months. I hope you resubscribe in September.
-- Harvey Newstrom <mailto://firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://newstaffinc.com> Author, Consultant, Engineer, Legal Hacker, Researcher, Scientist.