Paul Hughes wrote:
Anders Sandberg wrote:
>> That is why I get happy each time I see a wormhole
>>paper that sneaks around a few more of the energy
>>conditions - that makes the construction more
>Are you saying that their are new papers that refute
>the 'Topological Censor Hypothesis' that wormholes are
Is there any particular reason why this question has not been answered? I too am curious to know if wormholes are still possible under the latest constraints outlined in the paper.
HotBot - Search smarter.