Doug Jones wrote:
> QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 6/9/99 4:50:10 AM, you wrote:
> > > End of story, anything less is negligence,
> > >and the owner should be held accountable, at least civilly. Suing the
> > >manufacturer for the stupidity, laziness, or cowardliness of the
> > >legal owner is ludicrous.
> > What about smart guns?
> Yeah, riiiiiight. Look no further than a desktop computer to see
> just how stupid a smart gun would be. The intelligence belongs on
> the human side of the trigger, and there is no substitute for that
> at this time.
> How's this for a nightmare? A smart gun running under a Microsoft
*humans* being in control of them is bad enough.....
-- mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org http://i.am/dwayne "the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection into our dimension of something much larger and wirder." ---email@example.com ....return....to....the....source....