Date sent: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 16:27:28 -0400 From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Organization: http://lorrey.com http://artlocate.com To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Yeah, guns and guns and guns and guns Send reply to: firstname.lastname@example.org
> "Joe E. Dees" wrote:
> > From: EvMick@aol.com
> > > In a message dated 6/6/99 5:41:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > > email@example.com writes:
> > >
> > > > YOU would, since you share his extremist arm-the-violent-criminals-
> > > > the-kids-and-the-certifiably-insane agenda. Terry Nichols found Tim
> > > > McVeigh informative and reasoned.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thank you...no less a response than i would have expected...considering youre
> > > "reasoned, moderate, " suggestions to solve the problem(s)
> > >
> > They are a lot better than the unreasonable and immoderate
> > alternative of allowing all of the above to enjoy free and unfettered
> > access to the means to commit long-range mass murder (which is
> > Mike Lorrey's position).
> For someone who is ranting and raving and tossing crude insults about people making
> up lies about him, you are apparently the worst offender here. Show one quote where
> I advocate that. You can't.
You oppose all measures passable in the face of knee-jerk NRA opposition to deny such irresponsibles such free and unfettered access, which pragmatically amounts to the same damned thing. If this is truly not your position, then outline the measures you would be willing to support which could achieve the unquestionably laudable objective of denying violent criminals, kids and the mentally incompetent this free and unfettered access to guns.