> Menopause actually
> occurs regularly in primitive human societies (in other words, women live
> that long).
Of course; like I said, the fatal genes don't kill these women until after
they've stopped reproducing, and menopause is close enough to the normal
age of death in those societies that it isn't a big problem.
> Fertility is already in decline by that period (probably due
> to other agents already discussed) so being able to give birth would not
> result in a great success for the genes.
That seems like another circular argument. If the genes weren't reducing
fertility then they'd have a greater chance of success.
> It
> is a fallacy to think that genes don't "care" about a person after they
> have reproduced. Genes care about a person as long as the existence of
> that person is a benefit to the genes.
Of course it's some kind of compromise between all these factors.
Mark
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Mark Grant M.A., U.L.C. EMAIL: mark@unicorn.com |
|WWW: http://www.unicorn.com/ MAILBOT: bot@unicorn.com |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|