That seems like a reasonable assessment. Of course, people might
contractually agree not to go nude within common areas of a private
contractually based community, but that's of course not what you are
> In an Extropian type, anarcho-capitalistic society, clothing would
> definately be optional. I only raise this issue because so very many people
> think it is "evil" to be nude.
Of course it isn't "evil" except to supersitious people like certain
religious sects. On the other hand, I think it's frequently tasteless
-- most people's bodies are not particularly appetizing, and look
better when clothed to conceal the lack of care that has been taken to
maintain them. Tastelessness, of course, is not a crime -- if it
were, wearing a loud hawaiian shirt would be just as "evil" as
nudity. Neither should be legally sanctioned.