Rex
>----------
>From: 	FACTNet International[SMTP:factnet@rmii.com]
>Sent: 	Thursday, April 03, 1997 5:44 PM
>To: 	factnet@RMI.NET
>Subject: 	Net censorship, access cost increase, and IntellectualProperty
>alert!
>
>Net censorship, access cost increase, and Intellectual Property alert!
>
>Every netizen or organization that wants low cost net access, net 
>free speech, and uncensored e-mail has a high stake in a court 
>case soon to be decided in the litigation war involving Scientology,
>the Internet, and a nonprofit electronic library and historic archive 
>called FactNet.
>
>An emergency Internet and legal issues briefing has been prepared for 
>you and/or your organization at (www.factnet.org).  Factnet's Board of 
>Directors urgently asks your help to  promote both media coverage and 
>a vigorous dialogue among netizens on the immediate and substantial 
>threat this briefing discloses to the future of the Internet. 
>
>To help understand the importance of this briefing to Internet costs, 
>Internet slowdowns, Internet intellectual property and Internet free 
>speech please find the following media quotes.
>
>"If the church's (Scientology's) lawsuits prevail...future providers 
>of bulletin boards and newsgroups on the World Wide Web, as well as 
>the companies running such subscriber services as Prodigy, Compuserve, 
>and America Online might be forced to monitor or restrict information
>simply because they fear being sued...If system operators are liable for
>the content of the postings, it will lead to censorship...It would change
>the whole idea of how the Internet develops -- it's that important." 
>--Shari Steele, attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, as
>quoted in "The Net: Copyright or 'Free Press'?" Newsday, 10/10/95
>
>"Besides the technological curtailment of free speech, a skirmish like
>this one has the potential to completely disrupt the online operation not
>only of individual users, but also of entire networks overloaded by
>traffic their circuits were never designed to handle."  
>--Colman Jones, "Freedom Flames Out on the 'Net: Who Launched the 
>largest-ever Sabotage of the Internet?" 
>www.now.com/issues/15/44/News/feature.html 
>
>"Other [Internet] users have reported mysterious incidents: investigators
> visiting their neighbors, strangers attempting to get into their telephone
>records, e-mail sent to their sysadmins asking that their accounts be
>closed down. How did we get to this, in a free country?...
>
>"It turns out that a belief in free speech and an interest in 
>Scientology may involve you in the bitterest battle fought across 
>the Internet to date. A fight that has burst the banks of the Net 
>and into the real world of police,lawyers, and armed search and 
>seizure. Ultimately, however, the drama doesn't matter: the real 
>issues here are the boundaries of free speech and the future of 
>copyright and intellectual property in the face of a
>technology that can scatter copies across the world in seconds...
>"Whatever the motives, when computers are seized because they
>contain allegedly purloined intellectual property, messages are
>intercepted as they traverse the network, or the security of anonymous
>remailers is pierced by police, the days of the Internet as a cozy,
>private, intellectual cocktail party are over. .." 
>--Wendy M. Grossman, "alt.scientology.war," Wired, 8/95
>
>Lest anyone doubt Scientology's intentions, an article in the most 
>recent issue of an internal Scientology magazine called "High Winds" 
>proudly trumpets "groundbreaking lawsuits against both copyright 
>infringers and the computer service companies that served as 
>electronic conduits" for them. It goes on to predict "landmark 
>decisions" in which, "for the first time, Internet access providers 
>will be held responsible for any copyright infringements posted 
>through their facilities."  
>
>"The Internet is an information age tool that empowers individuals and
>reduces the need for a large, authoritarian government. It empowers the
>poor with an unregulated world of entrepreneurial opportunity... 
>Information and the new frontier could create a more fair, peaceful 
>society The free flow of information is central to America's foundation, 
>and '90s technology only enhances it. Unfortunately, it's all big threat
>to those in power who rely on the control of information to secure 
>their lofty positions. No matter what they call it, free speech is the 
>issue." --Wayne Langsen, "Raiding Free Speech," Boulder Weekly editorial. 
>                8/24/95 
>
>PLEASE help protect our mutual Internet freedoms by appropriately 
>forwarding this briefing to your personal or organizational network 
>of individuals, newsgroups, listservs, net media, and net watch 
>organizations where it hasn't appeared yet.
>
>Your timely attention to this critical briefing is appreciated,
>
>The Directors of Factnet
>Boulder Colorado USA
>
>P.S. Factnet has been reconstructing its electronic files since they 
>were sabotaged and returned to us by court order after the Scientology 
>raid. Our original mailing lists consisted of individuals and organizations 
>who had viewed materials or had an interest in Scientology's Internet 
>abuses and other human rights abuses. Because of the raid we are not 
>fully certain that our reconstructed mailing lists contain what they 
>originally contained or have been reassembled back into the proper lists. 
>These reconstructed mailing lists are far to important to the battle for 
>Internet free speech not to begin using again just because they were in 
>Scientology's possession.
>
>If you have received this alert and you have not previously reviewed or 
>been interested in any information on these issues let us know and we 
>will immediately correct the situation. We ask your understanding if 
>there has been an error or duplicate mailing. Try to imagine someone 
>illegally seizing all of your computers and computer files then searching 
>and altering and destroying parts of them. Finally you get it all back 
>to you in boxes and pieces. That's what happened to Factnet. Over the 
>last 12 months with minimal resources it has had to reconstruct 6 
>gigabits of its deliberately disordered returned libraries and files.  
>
>
>
>