RE: Iconoclasm (was: Chunking intelligence functions)

From: Natasha Vita-More (natashavita@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 10:58:04 MDT

Next message: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Traditional China as a counterexample to "spikism""
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Software Dvorak (was: Iconoclasm)"
Maybe in reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Iconoclasm (was: Chunking intelligence functions)"
Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Iconoclasm (was: Chunking intelligence functions)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>About the implicit assumption that in the default case, there is *a* better
way rather than being a multiplicity of ways each with their own advantages
and disadvantages...<

Yes.

I found a lot of meaning in Ben's post.

Natasha

Next message: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Traditional China as a counterexample to "spikism""
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Software Dvorak (was: Iconoclasm)"
Maybe in reply to: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Iconoclasm (was: Chunking intelligence functions)"
Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Iconoclasm (was: Chunking intelligence functions)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:04 MDT