Re: CRYO: "Ischemia" vs. "Reversibly dead"

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 10:42:07 MDT


Em, the "greater scheme of things" may matter less then a vastly expanded
lifetime, if one considers that philosophically, permanent unconsciousness is
equal to value death. I am paraphrasing John Leslie from the University of
Guelph in Canada. You can read a bit of Leslie's writings on Nick Bostrom's
website. But I demur to you, what you consider, more valid.

Mitch

In a message dated 4/30/2001 6:59:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
emlyn@one.net.au writes:

<< So, any life-extension techniques are merely temporary. If there's a God,
or
 otherwise an afterlife, it will get us in the end, afterall. God's meant to
 be immortal, eternal, etc etc... surely multiplying our lifespans by a few
 orders of magnitude couldn't really matter in the greater scheme of
 things...
 
 Just remember, as the heat death of the universe approaches, deathbed
 conversion is still an option...
 
 Emlyn
 (not that I believe in that stuff, mind you)
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:01 MDT