> > J. R. Molloy wrote:
>
> > > Incidentally, I don't see any presenters/speakers addressing
> the subject of
> > > triggering the Net to transcend. How silly is the idea of the
> Net awakening
> > > and thinking for itself?
>
> > It is a bit of wishful thinking: if we create something complex
> enough it
> > will become intelligent. There is not a shred of evidence for
> that happening,
> > since intelligent thought requires a rather sophisticated and deliberate
> > organisation, so it is unlikely to occur by chance.
I tend to have a "global-brain-ish" vision of the Singularity. I think that
a very intelligent AI system will incorporate the Net as part of its brain,
as well as experiencing the Net as much of its world (the brain/world
distinction not being as crisp in this case as it is for us).
But I agree that this won't be a spontaneous crystallization of intelligence
out of the Net. Rather, it will be a matter of an autonomous software
intelligence gradually restructuring more and more of the Net in its own
image, to all of our benefit...
ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:01 MDT