Re: CHAT: What statement?

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 00:07:40 MDT


On Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:30 PM Ross A. Finlayson raf@tiki-lounge.com
wrote:
> > > Others have use for them.
> >
> > Then others will have to speak for themselves.
>
> Then let them, that's one reason why I said that your statement was
incorrect. It
> wasn't a moral or ethical judgment, and it is grammatically true that what
I write
> is fact.

As evidence of your statement, I have use for most of them.

> > > Are you an objectionist?
> >
> > Sounds like another useless hypothesis (Randian in this case).
> > No, I'm an extropic Molloyist.
>
> Some people are objectivists. Objectivism is thinking that the world is
> immaterial.

Not exactly so -- or, at least, in my understanding. However, there are
many types of Objectivists (people in Rand's tradition) and objectivists.

Cheers!

Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:44 MDT