You can't ignore me.
J. R. Molloy wrote:
> From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Those are not "useless".
> I've no use for them.
> What use do you have for them?
Others have use for them. Are you an objectionist?
> > If that were so, then eternity would be engulfed in actual chaos. It is not
> > so.
> Please define "actual chaos."
> (Sounds a lot like another useless hypothesis.)
> --J. R.
> Useless hypotheses:
> consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
> analog computing
> Everything that can happen has already happened, not just once, but an
> infinite number of times, and will continue to do so forever.
I can actually define physical reality.
-- Ross Andrew Finlayson Finlayson Consulting Ross at Tiki-Lounge: http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~raf/ "It's always one more." - Internet multi-player computer game player
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:44 MDT