Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?

From: Jim Fehlinger (
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 19:41:12 MDT

"J. R. Molloy" wrote:
> None of this requires the notion of analog computing, right?

You're beginning to sound as desperate to find somebody to justify your
ruling out the possibility of analog computing as the Vatican
is to find neuroscientists who allow Catholics to cling
to Cartesian dualism (e.g. Sir John Eccles).

Why do you **care** so much? Hm?

NORFOLK: Look here, Cromwell. What's this all about, really?

CROMWELL: Ah, now there you have me! A matter of conscience,
I think.

-- _A Man For All Seasons_

Jim F.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:44 MDT