Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?

From: Jim Fehlinger (fehlinger@home.com)
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 19:49:36 MDT


"Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" wrote:
>
> Damien Broderick wrote:
> >
> > At 10:10 PM 4/2/01 -0400, Eliezer wrote:
> >
> > >> Here's a deep question: would an analog AI constructed out
> > >> of vacuum tubes have a "mellower" personality than one
> > >> made out of transistors? ;-> ;-> ;->
> >
> > >No.
> >
> > Oh.
> >
> > < hollow clunk >
> >
> > I think you might need to be twice as old as Eliezer to appreciate Jim's
> > gentle joke.
>
> *WHAP*
>
> (That was the sound of me slapping myself on the forehead.)

I see you've got your negative feedback
coupled into your push-pull input-output.
Take that across though your head-end pickup to your tweeter,
if you're modding more than eight you'll get wow on your top!

Try to bring it through your preamp rumble filter to your woofer,
what'll you get?
FLUTTER ON YOUR BOTTOM!

-- Flanders & Swann, "A Song of Reproduction"
http://timothyplatypus.tripod.com/FaS/hat_repro.html

I see there's also "A Song of Computation" at
http://www.durge.org/~edwin/songs/computation.html

I wonder if anybody on this list ever had a love affair with
a PDP-11/45? I was only ever an admirer from a distance ;-> .

Jim F.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:44 MDT