Re: French Anderson & GATTACA

From: J. R. Molloy (
Date: Sun Mar 25 2001 - 10:14:42 MST

Anders Sandberg has suggested,
> Ah, the "logic is just a rhetorical weapon" people. Yes, arguing
> against them is hard and messy. I think the best way to deal with them
> is to give examples and simple, clear explanations that make it very
> easy to see where the non-rational approach doesn't work.

That approach hasn't worked with "Feminists" as you can see by reading the
following article.

Feminism against science
Brief Summary: Feminist scholars have attempted in past years to use
Margaret Mead's work to justify sex-role reversibility. Even Mead stated
repeatedly that men have dominated societies as 'leaders in public affairs
amd the final authorities at home.' Feminism seeks to impose its own
ideological interpretation.


Stay hungry,

--J. R.

Useless hypotheses:
 consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:43 MDT