On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 02:56:02AM +0100, Anders Sandberg wrote:
> Nanotech in late industrialisation: likely less disruptive, just
> helping to speed along an already quickly expanding economy. Expect
> the general optimism of the society to explode outwards.
> Information technology introduction might give us some hints.
Or not. Despite living off the IT industry -- working as a programmer
and freelance IT journalist-- I'm not entirely sanguine about its
overall benefits for the human condition. (Sometimes it all looks like
a horrible distraction ... lots of wheel-spinning which is essentially
marketing bullshit rather than the engine of progress in motion.) We're
learning the wrong lessons from it: that we can make progress by
Powerpoint presentation, that companies can win in the marketplace by
attacking their competitors with spurious patent-infringement lawsuits,
and so on. (Read up on NCR sueing Palm this week for violating a 1987
patent on a handheld data terminal that NCR never built. Or Rambus up
in court and being sandbagged with RICO.)
> > Now, given that a lot of the political conflicts, famines, and other
> > unpleasantnesses we live with today are scarcity-related, doesn't it
> > make sense to try to understand how two thirds of the human species
> > will respond to technologies that promise to make most of the roots of
> > conflict magically go away?
> I agree with your view about the need for understanding new
> technologies in different cultural contexts, but I would say the the
> problems above are not magically solved by even strong
Nope. Human problems usually turn out to have human solutions: the tools
we use in reaching those solutions are incidental, although they often
make life a lot easier. But ...
> Scarcity is not just an issue of lack of resources or
> production capacity, it is also an issue of distribution and economic
> system. Under a Rob Mugabe even a nanotech society might starve.
Yes, but you missed another thing: in a nanotech society, scarcity may be
a function of broken intellectual property laws, inadequate education,
a government that can't attract capital investment inflow, and probably
half a dozen other factors we don't know about yet. Distribution and
economic problems are a hallmark of the industrial and mass production
era. We're going somewhere else ... talk about "mass customization" is
only the tip of the iceberg.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:41 MDT