From: Charlie Stross <charlie@antipope.org>
>And here's another thought: we need critics.
>It is generally a bad idea for new technologies to be adopted in
>a spirit of uncritical optimism, without anyone keeping a weather
>eye open for hazards and problems. I know these campaigners are
>anti-everything, and for that matter probably *too* critical to
>serve as useful critics, but I get worried sometimes when, reading
>this list, I see nothing but optimism about the future. It makes
>me wonder if we haven't failed to spot something bad.
I think you make a good point here.
Not all of us agree on every issue either. For example take
biotech, I think things like micronutrient rice are a great idea,
but I oppose the notion of things like Roundup-pretty-much-
anything.
I don't see creating genetically engineering plants so that
companies can make a lot of money selling herbicides as any kind of
advancement, except in the profit margin of these companies.
I don't want anything on my heirloom Brandywine tomatos except a
little kosher salt.
Brian
Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:39 MDT