From: Charlie Stross <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>And here's another thought: we need critics.
>It is generally a bad idea for new technologies to be adopted in
>a spirit of uncritical optimism, without anyone keeping a weather
>eye open for hazards and problems. I know these campaigners are
>anti-everything, and for that matter probably *too* critical to
>serve as useful critics, but I get worried sometimes when, reading
>this list, I see nothing but optimism about the future. It makes
>me wonder if we haven't failed to spot something bad.
I think you make a good point here.
Not all of us agree on every issue either. For example take
biotech, I think things like micronutrient rice are a great idea,
but I oppose the notion of things like Roundup-pretty-much-
I don't see creating genetically engineering plants so that
companies can make a lot of money selling herbicides as any kind of
advancement, except in the profit margin of these companies.
I don't want anything on my heirloom Brandywine tomatos except a
little kosher salt.
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:39 MDT