In a message dated 6/27/00 1:17:12 AM Central Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Hi Stan (and any observers still on board).
> Thanks for your quite reasonable comment. I'm deliberately restraining
> myself from any further replies on this issue, since I don't want to fan
> any flames.
[[ I am absolutely overwhelmed with work right now -- so only time for a
passing comment or two . . . ]]
1. Thanks Max, for that post -- there were things in it I didn't know that
helped clarify my understanding of the situation.
2. I personally think the speculation that folks who have spoken up on Brian
Delaney's behalf are pseudonyms for Brian is pretty way out.
3. Can we please let this drop.
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<email@example.com>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
ICQ # 61112550
"We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
-- Desmond Morris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:14:37 MDT