Just to make sure I don't get called a luddite: in my last message I was NOT
supporting Joy or Kacyznski or saying or implying that I am in favor of
stopping progress. I was merely speculating as to the amount of force
required, my point being that it would be politically more feasible to stop
progress than to take away technology that's already in wide use.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:13:57 MDT