> I'm sure you wouldn't agree, but many people probably feel that, if you
> already have a city with a high rate of crime, it makes perfect sense to
> restrict the number of people carrying loaded guns in public. While on the
> other hand, if you live in East Peapod, Wyoming, where everyone knows their
> neighbors and people feel safe enough not to lock their doors, why not let
> everyone pack if they want to? Makes sense to me.
As I'm sure Mike will point out as well, DC and NY have /not/ restricted
the number of people carrying weapons--they've only passed laws against
it, decreasing the number of non-policemen and non-politicians carrying
weapons legally (the ruling class still has this privilege). I don't
think there are any accurate stats on whether the actual number of
weapons went up or down (per capita) after the laws.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:13:57 MDT