Re: Bell's Inequality

From: John Clark (
Date: Sun Jun 04 2000 - 23:03:07 MDT

Adrian Tymes <> Wrote:

> I was positing that each of the 4 boxes was entangled with each other
> box in the same way that each of the original two boxes were entangled
> with each other.

How can it be that simple? What does "the other box" mean when you have 4 boxes?

> * If A and B are set 30 degrees apart, B uses A's sequence, with 1 in 4
> beats altered.

Well sure, but how exactly how are you going to make your boxes, how does
B know how A is set? You're going to need more than a internal hidden variable,
a local theory will never be able to explain it. And my boxes influence each other
instantly even if they are ten billion light years apart.

                 John K Clark

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:12:28 MDT