Re: ART: What Art Is

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 10:58:47 MDT


On Saturday, May 27, 2000 8:37 PM Dan Adams danadams@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm gonna have to recant and go with you on that point
> Daniel - good rebut!

No problem, but emotionally charged debate on this might have been
interesting.:)

Fopr the record, I think books like _What Art Is_ will do more for making
Objectivism a better philosophy. Critical examination -- as opposed to
uncritical acceptence or uncritical rejection -- is _the_ way.

Cheers!

Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:46 MDT