Re: Is the third time is the charm?

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lee@piclab.com)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 10:18:07 MDT

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Can I kill the "semantics"?"
Previous message: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: How to get your can o' philosophical WHOOP-ASS (was Psych or Fad: Freud'..."
In reply to: John Clark: "Is the third time is the charm?"
Next in thread: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
Reply: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Question: I've been making and destroying a billion Harvey Newstroms
> every second since you were a one celled zygote, so you tell me, who
> is the original Harvey Newstrom?

For what definition of "original"? For what definition of "Harvey
Newstrom"?

There aren't any objective facts in the question. It really is as
silly as Harvey keeps pointing out to you, and your insistence that
it must have some meaningful answer reflects badly on your powers
of rational discourse.

--
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Can I kill the "semantics"?"
Previous message: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: How to get your can o' philosophical WHOOP-ASS (was Psych or Fad: Freud'..."
In reply to: John Clark: "Is the third time is the charm?"
Next in thread: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
Reply: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:22 MDT