Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 13:57:15 MDT

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Uploading news item"
Previous message: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: Psych or Fad: Freud's Slip on Penis Envy, among otherthings"
In reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
>
> Typically, more foolish (or naive) people are ego-stricken and have a "need"
> to go about blabbing how smart and knowledgeable they are, while a true wise
> one is more likely to keep quiet allowing the observer to ask, bear and
> learn... really learn... with dignity.

Your statement is heartwarming, but false.

-- 
       sentience@pobox.com      Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
          http://pobox.com/~sentience/beyond.html
                 Member, Extropy Institute
           Senior Associate, Foresight Institute

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Uploading news item"
Previous message: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: Psych or Fad: Freud's Slip on Penis Envy, among otherthings"
In reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Next in thread: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:19 MDT