In a message dated 5/14/00 8:15:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
<< I will simply observe that I made a concrete suggestion
about what *we* could all as individuals do to allow
the recreation of "beings", in the not too distant
future, with reasonable probabilities of looking like former
individuals whose mental and biomaterial had been preserved.
This seems to have gone from A, to B, to Z, where Z
represents the "Wouldn't it be nice if we had some more
magic physics so we can have everything we ever wanted." >>
Interesting what one would consider 'magic physics' and what one considers
within the realm of coherent probability? Many people, yes even scholars
educated in physics, astronomy, biology, and computer science; would, sadly,
be very scornful of this entire mailing list and the subjects that govern it.
Perhaps some guidence might be in order for levels of acceptability on what
falls into the realm of reality and what is beyond the pale? Are multiple
universes magic physics or non-locality?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:11:13 MDT