Ruthanna R Gordon wrote:
> (It also says, if I'm going to be honest, that perhaps I think
> Lockheed-Martin ought to buy their surveilance photos from private Russian
> satelite owners, same as the rest of us...
LM has its own commercial imaging satellites. We need not buy
them from the commies... {8^D
> However, I am against the public
> surveilance that is already in place as well, with the exception of very
> limited things like the cameras that focus on ATM keypads.
Can you think of *any* other places where you *want* cameras?
Just having cameras at the ATM prevents or greatly reduces the
probability of someone from robbing you, does it not? spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:10:53 MDT