Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> "Michael S. Lorrey" <email@example.com> wrote on Saturday, May 06, 2000
> 11:28 AM,
> Subject: Re: law enforcement for profit
> > Zero Powers wrote:
> > > I really had no idea that going by a nickname would cause such a
> > > especially on a list populated with people named Max More, Natasha
> > > Vita-More, Spudboy, Tom Morrow, etc. But, I case if you can't deal with
> > > guy's arguments, the next best thing is to pick on his chosen name, huh?
> > The only reason we bring it up with you is that you insist on beleiving
> > that openness and big brother observation of our every move is a good
> > thing. Nobody else that you've named is either a) unknown to us, or b)
> > advocates totalitarian policies like you do with such enthusiasm and
> > wild abandon. If you are going make such arguments, then you best live
> > up to them, right? Otherwise your credibility is shot.
> Mike, I believe you were doing fine when you were attacking Zero's
> theories. I do not think it is necessary for you to now attack the person
> as well. We should be able to evaluate any discussion point without trying
> to evaluate the person.
It all goes to motive Harvey. If I think the nobody in the world should
be able to have secrets, but I refuse to even give evidence of my
identity, its rather obvious that my motives are not altruistic. Calling
me on this fact throws down the gaunlet that I either practice what I
preach, or be exposed as a hypocrite.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:10:35 MDT