On Wed, 3 May 2000, Matt Gingell wrote:
> > > Imagine I could simulate, in real time, a system of 100 atoms using 50
> > > atoms. I can then have two groups of 50 running in real time with perfect
> >Of course, you can't do that. Also, you don't mention which modelling
> >paradigm you're contemplating, say QM or MD.
> Exactly - it's like thinking you could emulate a P2 on a P2 and end up with
> something faster. The implication therefore is that you can't model the whole
> universe in anything smaller than the whole universe, which is why I don't
> understand why someone would claim you could simulate everything with a star.
> Given the constraint of perfect fidelity (if indeed that means anything), then
> which paradigm you work in is just a bookkeeping issue.
I had presumed he meant the whole universe minus the simulation star. Of
course, that would be only half the information in the universe being
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:10:27 MDT