Re: Minds, Machines, and the Multiverse

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Wed May 03 2000 - 23:00:03 MDT


In a message dated 5/3/00 5:37:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
mjg223@is7.nyu.edu writes:

<< Exactly - it's like thinking you could emulate a P2 on a P2 and end up with
 something faster. The implication therefore is that you can't model the whole
 universe in anything smaller than the whole universe, which is why I don't
 understand why someone would claim you could simulate everything with a star.
 Given the constraint of perfect fidelity (if indeed that means anything),
then
 which paradigm you work in is just a bookkeeping issue.
 
 -matt >>
My guess is that to emulate the cosmos, one need not simulate itself, entire;
but merely the effects to varied observers. Gravity need only to behave as
if it is one G, to 6-10 billion of earth's inhabitants(proggies); and not
actually manifest itself physically. Closer to last year's movie The 13th
Floor. Or as the expert said; Heck I dunno.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:10:27 MDT