>From: Charlie Stross <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 05:37:56PM -0700, Zero Powers wrote:
> > Although I tend toward the "bleeding heart" end of the spectrum, I look
> > capital punishment as a cost vs. benefit analysis. You got a human scum
> > (say, Charlie Manson) who has amply demonstrated that he will never be
> > for anything except warming a prison cell. Do we keep him alive for no
> > reason until he wastes away, at a cost of umpteen thousand dollars per
> > or do we put him and us out of our mutual misery by killing and
> > him at a cost of a few thousand and be done with it? The answer to me
> > obvious.
>Unless you take into account the possibility that he might be innocent
>but wrongly convicted. Here in the UK, they've tightened up the appeals
>and miscarriages-of-justice process a bit in the past few years, and
>added DNA testing to the battery of forensic techniques available.
>The result is that roughly 10-15% of historic "guilty" verdicts are
>being overturned, in crimes as serious as murder.
>Face it, the judicial system is a system created by human beings. As
>such, it is fallible -- even without side-issues like police corruption
>and political interference.
>Think of that nice warm prison cell Charlie Manson sleeps in every night
>as YOUR personal insurance premium against being summarily executed for
>a crime you didn't commit.
Hmmm. That, as they say, is a good point.
"I like dreams of the future better than the history of the past"
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:36 MDT