Joe Dees wrote:
> >Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:28:09 -0400
> >From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <email@example.com>
> >To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >Subject: Re: GUNS: Prevention vs. Punishment, Parental vs. Child Responsibility
> >Reply-To: email@example.com
> >Cynthia wrote:
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Joe Dees <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> > As the Prez said, we punish reckless drivers, but we still install child
> >> seats and seat belts. We punish airplane hijackers, but we still have metal
> >> detectors and luggage inspection at airports. It is said that an ounce of
> >> prevention is worth a pound of cure. Why should firearms be the only thing
> >> where prevention is forbidden?
> >> Why are you quoting the prez, like we care about his opinion? A better analogy
> >> would be, we punish hijackers, but we still have airline flights! The goal of
> >> the anti gun movement is nothing less than to take away guns from honest people.
> >> Why do you come in here and make obviously misleading statements as if we all
> >> have noodles for brains?
> >Wow, Cynthia. I don't even need to say another word...
> Ad hominem fallacies have always been good enough for you, Mike.
Ha, says the kettle to the pot....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:24 MDT