Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-notsin2050)

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Sun Apr 16 2000 - 20:08:51 MDT

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Mass Drivers and Cheap Space Access: Limits"
Previous message: Zero Powers: "Re: LAW: Bar Associations and Monopolies (Was: POL: Reaction to Microsoft Ruling)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Reply: Robert Bradbury: "SPACE: Launch vehicles"
Reply: Emlyn (pentacle): "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 4/11/00 10:26:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
sentience@pobox.com writes:

> like females being able to find
> objects ranging from ketchup to complete four-course meals in
> exhaustively male-searched refrigerators.

I knew a gal like that once...

I had a refrigerator like that once too...

Evmick

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Mass Drivers and Cheap Space Access: Limits"
Previous message: Zero Powers: "Re: LAW: Bar Associations and Monopolies (Was: POL: Reaction to Microsoft Ruling)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Reply: Robert Bradbury: "SPACE: Launch vehicles"
Reply: Emlyn (pentacle): "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves andhave-notsin2050)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:23 MDT