Wine 101 (was Re: POL: Reaction to Microsoft ruling)

From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 12:09:43 MDT


From: Charlie Stross <charlie@antipope.org>

>> Ahem: Champagne and Burgundy are _regions_ of France. Their
>>produce is appelation controlee, meaning it's graded by quality.
>>This is to some extent a hold-over from the agricultural age,
>>and you'll note the tendency to name modern wines by the grape
>>they're produced from -- which isn't a controlled designation.
 
>>If someone in California makes wine that is indistinguishable
>>from champagne to a panel of tasters in a double blind test, it
>>is champagne, and they should be free to call it that.

>>By that reasoning, if I can make an operating system that is
>>indistinguishable from Windows (presumably by reverse-engineering
>>all their APIs), I should be free to call it Windows. Right?

>> Accepting the claims of the French for 'cultural heritage', when
>>that 'heritage' is nothing more than a desire to maintain their
>>elite attitude as being the 'superior culture' of the planet is
>>ludicrous.

>Nonsense. Appelation controlee status is just a variation on
>trademark law, one that you don't recognize because you're a
>parochial-minded American with very little experience of the
>outside world.

>Calling Californian bubbly "Champagne" is an attempt to violate
>the regional trademark.

Nonsense. The standard for producing Champagne is internationally
recognized. It is by definition produced by me'thode champenoise.
They are produced in a variety of places around the world. It is
the method of production, not one isolated region that make the
difference.

Upstate New York produces some excellent champagne for example.
(try a Gold Seal Blanc de Blanc sometime.)

>This is an entirely different issue from trademark law, and
>variants thereon like the appelation controllee stuff (which
>doesn't exist in the USA but is widely recognized as having the
>weight of trademark law elsewhere in the world). Incidentally, it
>can be argued that those Californian bubbly producers who call
>their produce Champagne have exactly the same relationship to the
>real thing that Chinese software pirates have with Microsoft:
>they're simply infringing a form of intellectual.

More nonsense.

Appellations exist in the U.S. and every other wine producing
country in the world.

Try an outstanding Australian Shiraz/Syrah while your at it.

Get thee to www.winespectator.com

<sigh> I wish I was in Provence right now....

Brian

Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Mars Society, www.marssociety.org
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:09:18 MDT