>From: "John Clark" <jonkc@worldnet.att.net>
>
>Robert Bradbury <bradbury@genebee.msu.su> Wrote:
>
> >Within milliseconds of the copying process however, neither of them
> >is "an original".
>
>Exactly. It doesn't matter who the original is because you can only have
>a true "original" if there is no change and life by its very nature is
>change.
>In other words, if it's really original then it's dead.
Well, close. In actuality, if it's really an unchanging original it's
nothing but a Platonic abstraction, a sort of universal law. Because
*everything* that physically exists is subject to change.
-Zero
"I like dreams of the future better than the history of the past"
--Thomas Jefferson
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:08:58 MDT