Re: Many-Worlds Interpretation

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• [ Next ][ Previous ] In reply to: Bryan Moss

At 02:02 PM 3/30/99 +0100, Bryan Moss wrote:
>(The reason I asked the original question was because I had been given the
>impression that MWI gave a better explanation of the observer problem than
>other interpretations. Clearly it does not.)

I really have to disagree here. MWI DOES give a better explanation of the existence of randomness: it demonstrates that what appears random isn't, and explains why it would appear random anyway. What more would we want from such an answer?

-Dan

     -IF THE END DOESN'T JUSTIFY THE MEANS-
               -THEN WHAT DOES-

• [ Next ][ Previous ] In reply to: Bryan Moss