"Billy Brown" <bbrown@conemsco.com> writes:
> Anders Sandberg wrote:
> > I agree that we need some different scenarios to look at. There were a
> > few scenarios mentioned in the technology thread a few weeks back
> > based on the relative arrival of AI, nanotech and hardware; while they
> > just ended up in the big Singularity discussion, I think the approach
> > is good. We could list the potential technologies and methods
> > available, figure out an approximative dependency tree (i.e. "If we
> > have reliable nanotech, massively parallel CA-style computers become
> > easy and cheap") and discuss the consequences. Most likely this can
> > get extremely complex, so we should either try to run it as a scenario
> > planning project or find some useful hypertext/critlink model to keep
> > track of all the links.
>
> I think a moderated web site would work well enough to be worthwhile. I'd
> be happy to code one up, if someone wants to volunteer the server space.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y