Re: Transhumanist Principles 2.1

Natasha Vita More (
Mon, 30 Mar 1998 14:01:07 -0600

At 04:32 PM 3/30/98 +0000, Nick Bostrom wrote:

>Yes, I suggest we call it The Transhumanist Declaration 2.2.

Hi Nick,

I think there may already be a Transhumanist Declaration. My suggestion is to call it "WTA Transhumnist Declaration 2.2;" or "WTA Transhumanist Statement 2.2." This way, it is clearly identified as WTA's take on transhumanist ideas.

I recall a document titled a Transhumanist Doctrine was written some years ago by a few people in Southern California. I am aware that there might be any number of such documents. (I alluded to this on our transhumanism communications.)

Thus, if we title WTA's statement specifically, it might be advantageous.



<center>Natasha Vita More [fka Nancie Clark] --

Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art --

<bigger>**NEW** </bigger><bold>Transhuman Culture InfoMark<bigger>

PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!

<italic>The best defense is an aesthetic offense.