> IAN: Your effort is to equate Hitler responding
> to Jews with deadly gas to suppliers responding
> to consumers with better washing machines. It's
> a shell game. The difference that your analysis
> obscures is that one set of responses are acts
> of aggression and the other are acts of service.
The analysis doesn't have to take the 'act' into count, at no time
have we appended "with agression" to the definition of "centralised."
> The response by Hitler is an effort to suppress
> control by the many, the response of suppliers
> to consumers accepts control by the many. Your
> trying to make "the different" "the same as."
Many acts of "acceptance" and "supression" would be commited by either
a Nazi dictator or a supplier. I'm sure the average CEO takes many
decisions that could be considered to "supress control of the many"
and I'm sure Hitler made many changes to his plans due to the will of
the people.
> So what's your (central) plan for decentralization?
We should all strive to be in the centre.
--Wax
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com