Context vs Crackpotism

Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 03:56:16 -0500


Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com) wrote:

>Admittedly the term is not meaningful without
>a context, namely the scale in question.

IAN: That's exactly what I'm saying with
respect to identity: there is no identity
external to context. Everything that exists
exists in context, and context is holistic.

When we say what an elephant is (a member
of X family of animals that live in Y set
of locations), we put it in context, yet
when we say what A is, "A=A," we remove
it from context. When I define identity
as "A is A relative to ~A," I put it
in context, as it exists in reality.

Nobody has ever shown me an example of
a thing, A, being A free from relation,
and yet all those who cannot show that
such is true, continue to claim that
it is. That defines crackpotism.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________

GODDARD'S METAPHYSICS --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________________