>> WHAT IS A "CRACKPOT" ?
>
>I like to use that term specifically for people who
>spend most of their time arguing definitions, rather
>than actual substance and content, and who seem to
>think that it is an exercise of reason to do so.
IAN: So that's your definition of "crackpot."
Well, you just fulfilled it. Now how about
putting some substance where you "mouth" is.
You allege without evidence that there exists
somewhere a shortfall between "arguments pre-
sented" (although you have not indicated which
ones these are) and "actual substance and con-
tent." So where, pray tell, is the "actual
substance and content" of your argument?
****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________
TWA-800 CASE CORE --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/twa-core.htm
________________________________________________________________