Re: Defining Human - Gods will

Arjen Kamphuis (
Tue, 10 Mar 1998 21:14:15 +0100 (CET)

At 22:44 9-03-98 +0000, Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin wrote:
>Ova, on the other hand, perhaps as many as a third could survive to
>adulthood. God obviously has a higher opinion of ova than of sperm,
>and we don't want to argue with God, do we? So we should prohibit
>female virginity, or even sexual abstinence by females.
> (removing tongue from cheek)
> (on second thought, putting it back for a second)
>Remember, if God wanted us to go naked, we'd be born that way.

Which is why Tom's houserule #2 (Clothing permitted) shows he's a very
tolerant person ;-)

Speaking of women... It is interesting to see that in this thread
particularly _all_ posts have been by humans who are genetically impaired
to get pregnant (I don't mind personally but I suspect mr. Jones does -
ever consider therapy?).

Possibly the women on this list (and Natascha recently reminded us that
there are plenty of them out there) are trying not to fall from their
chairs laughing. All of us guys arguing over something that is more _their_
business than almost any other thing ;-)

What the hell are we thinking? ;-)

Arjen (happy to be XY-genotype and never grow-up)

_/ _/
_/ Dear Lord, give me chastity and self-control. _/
_/ But not yet my Lord, not yet! _/
_/ St. Augustine _/
_/ _/